<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joe Junkin &#187; ClimateGate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joe.junkin.com/tag/climategate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joe.junkin.com</link>
	<description>Life as it happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A nice summation of climategate</title>
		<link>http://joe.junkin.com/2010/01/14/a-nice-summation-of-climategate/</link>
		<comments>http://joe.junkin.com/2010/01/14/a-nice-summation-of-climategate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjunkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joe.junkin.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following excerpts are one of the best descriptions I have seen to describe the issues found in the climategate emails:
(Climategate) &#8220;e-mails show that a close-knit group of the world&#8217;s most influential climate scientists actively colluded to subvert the peer-review process &#8230; manufactured pre-determined conclusions through the use of contrived analytic techniques; and discussed destroying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following excerpts are one of the best descriptions I have seen to describe the issues found in the climategate emails:</p>
<p>(Climategate) &#8220;e-mails show that a close-knit group of the world&#8217;s most influential climate scientists actively colluded to subvert the peer-review process &#8230; manufactured pre-determined conclusions through the use of contrived analytic techniques; and discussed destroying data to avoid government freedom-of-information requests.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Viewed collectively, the CRU e-mails reveal a scientific community in which a group of scientists promoting what has become, through their efforts, the dominant climate-change paradigm are at war with other scientists derisively labeled as &#8217;skeptics,&#8217; &#8216;deniers,&#8217; and &#8216;contrarians,&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>From the New York Times article:<br />
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/01/13/13climatewire-insurance-group-says-stolen-e-mails-show-ris-91554.html<br />
This references a letter sent by Robert Detlefsen, the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies vice president of policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joe.junkin.com/2010/01/14/a-nice-summation-of-climategate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
